|Motorists wait in lanes of traffic heading into the United States from Mexico at the U.S. border crossing in San Ysidro, California (Reuters / Mike Blake)|
A growing number of Americans is protesting invasive Border Patrol checkpoints deep inside US territory by refusing to answer questions, and posting online their recordings of harassment by officers.
More and more YouTube videos document citizens’ resistance to the Border Patrol at checkpoints throughout the 100-mile zone along US borders. In some cases, motorists are waved through. In others, they are violently arrested and detained, simply for refusing to answer questions or consent to searches.
In one example, cited by Houston Chronicle reporter Dane Schiller, a Texas truck driver was forcibly removed from his truck, arrested and held for several hours after telling officers he was “opting out” of discussing his citizenship. Navy veteran Thomas Sauer, 26, says he lost his job as a result.
As he was being arrested, “they told me I had the right to remain silent,” Sauer told the Chronicle.
Even though Border Patrol agents deleted Sauer’s cell phone video of the encounter, he was able to retrieve it using a data restoration service. The 19-minute video has nearly 150,000 views on YouTube.
Rick Herbert of California, who refused to consent to move his car into an inspection area and have it searched, was dragged out of the vehicle in front of his crying wife and 4-year-old son.
Border Patrol cannot legally pull motorists from vehicles just because they refuse to answer questions, James Lyall of the American Civil Liberties Union told the Houston Chronicle. “Everyone has the right to remain silent and can't be compelled to answer,” he said.
The Fourth Amendment to the US Constitution prohibits “unreasonable searches and seizures” of people and property. In practice, says the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), Border Patrol agents “routinely ignore the limits of their legal authority.”
“These problems are compounded by inadequate training for Border Patrol agents, a lack of oversight by CBP and the US Department of Homeland Security, and the consistent failure of CBP to hold agents accountable for abuse,” says the ACLU website. “Thus, although the 100-mile border zone is not literally ‘Constitution free,’ the US government frequently acts like it is.”
Roughly two thirds of all Americans – over 200 million people – live within the 100-mile border zone where the CBP is authorized to set up checkpoints. Eleven states are entirely in the zone, as are nine out of ten largest US metropolitan areas. In 2014, Arizona Republic journalistsestimated there were approximately 170 checkpoints around the US.
“Our enforcement presence along these strategic routes reduces the ability of criminals and potential terrorists to easily travel away from the border,” reads a CBP pamphlet quoted by the San Diego Union-Tribune in a December 2014 feature.
The US Supreme Court upheld the legality of CBP checkpoints in 1976, but said the agents could only ask about US citizenship. To do conduct further inquiries, they are required to have a probable cause.
“To say people should not stand up for their rights reflects a fundamental misunderstanding of what it means to live in a democracy,” ACLU’s Lyall said. “Rights aren't worth a damn if you can't exercise them.”
Reason magazine posted a video of what an ideal, constitutional CBP stop would look like:
Post a Comment